top of page
radonorm_logo_vaaka_slogan_CMYK-removebg
MapChart_home.png

Findings for

Intercomparison of Countries

Cite as:

Perko T. (2025): RadoNorm European Radon Behavioural Atlas, H2020 project RadoNorm, No 900009 https://www.radonorm.eu/

Methodology

The RadoNorm European Radon Behavioral Atlas is the largest and most comprehensive cross-national study to date examining behaviors, attitudes, and awareness related to radon exposure across Europe. The dataset comprises 17,253 respondents, with an average interview duration of 21 minutes and includes over 250 survey items. Data collection occurred from 2021 to 2024, beginning with a pilot study in Belgium and concluding in Portugal. The study spans 15 European countries—Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Finland, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Norway, Portugal, Romania, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden—as well as selected sub-national regions (e.g., Wallonia in Belgium and Galicia in Spain).

Data were collected using Computer-Assisted Web Interviewing (CAWI) in all countries except Bulgaria, where Computer-Assisted Personal Interviewing (CAPI) was employed. In each country, quota sampling ensured national representativeness by gender, age group, and level of urbanization. Post-stratification weights based on education level were applied to correct for sampling imbalances; these weights are included in the open-access dataset.

Respondents were primarily recruited from national probability-based or high-quality access panels, with the exception of the Czech Republic, where participants were drawn from a national radon concentration monitoring survey. The survey instrument was originally developed in English, then translated into the respective national languages, and subsequently back-translated into English by independent translators to ensure semantic equivalence and conceptual clarity across languages.

The survey was administered in collaboration with national authorities responsible for radon risk management and action plans in each participating country. The resulting Atlas provides an empirically grounded, cross-national overview of radon-related behavioral patterns, offering valuable insights into public engagement, risk perception, and gaps in home testing and remediation practices.

Data collection was carried out by contracted market research companies in each participating country. The overall coordination of data collection was managed by SCK CEN and the University of Antwerp (Belgium). Data analysis was conducted by SCK CEN, while data visualization was developed collaboratively by the Elektroinštitut Milan Vidmar (Slovenia) and SCK CEN (Belgium). Ethical approval for the study was obtained from national ethics committees where available. In countries without a national ethics committee, ethical guidance was provided by the RadoNorm Ethics Committee. All procedures were conducted in accordance with the ethical requirements outlined in the European Commission’s guidelines for research in the social sciences and humanities, ensuring respect for participants’ rights, dignity, and data protection. All data are open and available in the STORE database.

Download the questionnaire PDF here.

Download Common statistical scale characteristics and correlations with behavioural intention here.

Results

Radon protection behaviour

Are people aware of radon and do they test and mitigate?

RA2_1_final.png
RA2_2_final.png
RA2_4_final.png
RA2_5.png

Intention to protect from radon

What is the public willingness to adopt radon protection measures?

RA5.png
RA5_1.png
RA6.png
RA8.png

Radon awareness

Are people aware of radon?

radon_awareness.png

Is radon indoor seen as an important topic?

Salience

SALI1.png

Radon Knowledge

How much people know about radon?

Picture1.png

Risk perception

How do people perceive radiological, radon and other risks?

RP6_final.png
RP12_final.png
RP20.png

Confidence in authorities for risk management

To what extent do people have confidence in their authorities' ability to manage risks?

RC6_final.png
RC12_final.png
RC20.png

Severity

What are people's beliefs regarding the seriousness of negative consequences due to radon?

RA12.png

Susceptibility

Do people believe that radon increases the likelihood of health consequences?

RA14_1.png

Do individuals believe dwelling remediation is effective in reducing radon concentration?

Response efficacy: remediation

RA19.png
RA21.png

Self-efficacy

Do residents have confidence in their own ability to conduct radon testing and mitigation effectively?

RA22.png

Perceived behavioural control: financial and other burden and ease

Is radon testing and mitigation perceived as a financial or other burden?

RA22_a.png
RA22_b.png
RA23_1.png
RA26.png

Subjective norms

Do family members and friends of resopondents care about radon-related issues?

RA34_1.png

Descriptive norms

Is radon testing and mitigation a common practice within social groups?

RA35a.png

Information comprehensiveness

Is there enough information readily accessible?

RA30.png
RA31.png

Radon spa

To what extent do people agree or disagree with statements about radon spas?

spa1_histogram_multi_02.png
spa2_histogram_multi_02.png
spa3_histogram_multi_02.png
spa4_histogram_multi_02.png
spa5_histogram_multi_02.png

Factors Influencing Behavioural Intention

Radon awareness

sankey_sali1_intention_all.png
sankey_ra1_intention_all.png

Formative knowledge

sankey_formative_knowledge_beh-intention_ALL_count-based-quantiles.png
sankey_formative_knowledge_beh-intention_ALL_count-based.png
sankey_formative_knowledge_beh-intention_ALL_equal-thirds.png

Risk perception

sankey_rp12a_intention_all.png
sankey_rp12b_intention_all.png

Confidence in authorities for risk management

sankey_rc12a_intention_all.png
sankey_rc12b_intention_all.png

Severity

sankey_severity_self_intention_all.png

Susceptibility

sankey_susceptibility_intention_all.png
sankey_susceptibilityothers_intention_all.png

Response efficacy: remediation

sankey_response-efficacy_intention_all.png
sankey_responseefficacy_intention_all.png

Self efficacy

sankey_efficacy-info_intention_all.png
sankey_selfefficacy_remediation_intention_all.png

Perceived behavioural control: financial and other burden and ease

sankey_pb_control_intention_all.png
sankey_perceivedburden_intention_all.png
sankey_perceived_ease_intention_all.png

Perceived cost

sankey_ra23_intention_all.png
sankey_ra26_intention_all.png
sankey_perceivedcost_intention_all.png

Aesthetic impact of remediation works on a dwelling

sankey_aesthet.impact_intention_all.png

Economic impact of radon on a property value

sankey_economicimpact_intention_all.png

Subjective norms

sankey_subjectivenorms_intention_all.png

Descriptive norms

sankey_descriptivenorms_intention_all.png

Moral norms

sankey_injunctivemoralnorms_intention_all.png

Moral values

sankey_moralvalues_intention_all.png

Social influence

sankey_social_influence_intention_all.png

Health effect perception

sankey_ra37_1_intention_all.png

Stigma

sankey_stigma_intention_all.png

Information processing

sankey_systematic_intention_all.png
sankey_heuristic_intention_all.png
sankey_heuristic_processing_intention_all.png

Information comprehensiveness

sankey_info_comprehensiveness_intention_all.png

Information uncertainty

sankey_ra50_intention_all.png

Affective response to information

sankey_affective_response_intention_all.png
bottom of page