top of page
radonorm_logo_vaaka_slogan_CMYK-removebg
Norway.png

Findings for

Norway

Cite as:

Perko T. (2025): RadoNorm European Radon Behavioural Atlas: Norway, H2020 project RadoNorm, No 900009 https://www.radonorm.eu/

Methodology

Computer-Assisted Personal Interviews (CAPI) were conducted in Norway using the online panel of the marketing research company Norstat, which includes approximately 124,000 active respondents. A dynamic sampling approach was employed to obtain a sample that was as representative as possible of the adult population (aged 18 and older) in terms of gender, age, and region. Sampling quotas were guided by expected response rates across socio-demographic groups. When specific groups were underrepresented, additional participants were recruited to meet the predefined quotas, within the limitations of the panel. A weight variable corresponding to the quotas is provided in the dataset.

The survey began on December 7, 2023, with a pilot/soft launch that collected 92 responses. The data from this initial phase were shared with the Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NMBU) and the Belgian Nuclear Research Centre (SCK CEN) for review on December 12, 2023, and approved on December 13, 2023. Additional samples were distributed daily from December 13 to December 18, 2023.

Fieldwork was conducted by Norstat, a company that operates in compliance with the EU General Data Protection Regulation (EU-GDPR) and adheres to ESOMAR guidelines for market and social research. The final sample comprised N = 1,263respondents, yielding a response rate of 20.3%.

The questionnaire was collaboratively developed by the RadoNorm project and the Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NMBU). NMBU was responsible for the translation into Norwegian. Ethical approval for the study was granted by the NMBU Ethics Committee, and the data were analyzed by SCK CEN, Belgium. Data are available at: DOI:10.20348/STOREDB/1179/1305]

Download the questionnaire PDF here.

Download the technical report PDF here.

Results

Radon protection behaviour

Do people in Norway test and mitigate?

RA2_1_Norway.png
RA2_2_Norway.png
RA2_4_Norway.png
RA2_5_Norway.png

Trustworthiness of radon stakeholders

Who in Norway is recognized as a trustworthy source of information about radon risks?

comp_truth_fam_NOR.png

Radon awareness

Are people in Norway aware of radon?

ra1_overview_NOR_titled.png

Intention to protect from radon

What is the public willingness to adopt radon protection measures in Norway?

behavioural_intention_NOR_titled.png

Radon Knowledge

How much people in Norway know about radon?

awareness_noprone_NOR_perc.png
awareness_noprone_NOR_validperc.png

Risk perception

How do people in Norway perceive radiological, radon and other risks?

likert_rp_NOR_titled.png

Confidence in authorities for risk management

To what extent do Norwegians have confidence in their authorities' ability to manage risks?

likert_rc_NOR_titled.png

Knowing radon stakeholders

Which stakeholders related to radon are known to Norwegians?

tr_fam_likert_NOR_titled.png

Truthfulness of radon stakeholders

Who in Norway is recognized as a trustworthy source of information about radon risks?

truth_likert_NOR_titled.png
comp_truth_fam_NOR.png

Which stakeholders involved in radon mitigation in Norway are recognized as technically competent?

Competence of radon stakeholders

competence_likert_NOR_titled.png
comp_truth_fam_NOR.png

Severity

What are people's beliefs regarding the seriousness of negative consequences due to radon?

severity_NOR_titled.png

Susceptibility

Do people in Norway believe that radon increases the likelihood of health consequences?

susceptability_NOR_titled.png

Do individuals believe dwelling remediation is effective in reducing radon concentration?

Response efficacy: remediation

Remediation_NOR_titled.png

Self-efficacy

Do residents in Norway have confidence in their own ability to conduct radon testing and mitigation effectively?

Self-efficacy_general_NOR_titled.png
Self-efficacy_information_NOR_titled.png
Self-efficacy_remediation_NOR_titled.png

Perceived behavioural control: financial and other burden and ease

Is radon testing and mitigation perceived as a financial or other burden?

perceived_behaviour_NOR_titled.png
perceived_burden_NOR_titled.png
perceived_cost_NOR_titled.png
perceived_ease_NOR_titled.png

Aesthetic impact of remediation works on a dwelling

Do residents believe that radon mitigation would visually harm their homes?

aesthetic_impact_NOR_titled.png

Economic impact of radon on a property value

Does a radon problem in a building negatively impact its financial value?

economic_impact_NOR_titled.png

Social influence

What are the attitudes of respondents regarding social influence?

soc_influence_NOR_titled.png

Descriptive norms

Is radon testing and mitigation a common practice within social groups?

descriptive_norms_NOR_titled.png

Subjective norms

Do family members and friends of resopondents care about radon-related issues?

ra34_1_ggplot_NOR_titled.png
ra34_2_ggplot_NOR_titled.png
ra34b_ggplot_NOR_titled.png
ra34_ggplot_NOR_titled.png

Health effect perception

Do individuals have acquaintances who may have experienced health issues as a result of radon exposure?

health_effect_NOR_titled.png

Information processing

How do people process information about radon remediation?

heur_info_processing_NOR_titled.png
sys_info_processing_NOR_titled.png

Information comprehensiveness

Is there enough information readily accessible?

info_compr_NOR_titled.png

Information uncertainty

Is there too much uncertainty to make informed decisions?

info_uncer_NOR_titled.png

Willingness to engage

How much are people willing to engage?

willingness_engage_NO_titled.png

Affective response to information

Does information related to radon elicit negative emotions?

response_info_NOR_titled.png

Preference for post-survey radon related information

Which communication channels are recommended for radon-related communication?

post_survey_NOR_titled.png

Factors Influencing Behavioural Intention

Radon awareness

sankey_ra1_intention_NOR.png
sankey_sali1_intention_NOR.png

Social influence

sankey_social_influence_intention_NOR.png

Risk perception

sankey_rp12a_intention_NOR.png
sankey_rp12b_intention_NOR.png

Confidence in authorities for risk management

sankey_rc12a_intention_NOR.png
sankey_rc12b_intention_NOR.png

Severity

sankey_severity_self_intention_NOR.png
sankey_severity_intention_NOR.png

Susceptibility

sankey_susceptibility_intention_NOR.png
sankey_susceptibilityothers_intention_NOR.png

Response efficacy: remediation

sankey_responseefficacy_intention_NOR.png
sankey_response-efficacy_intention_NOR.png

Self efficacy

sankey_efficacy-info_intention_NOR.png
sankey_selfefficacy_intention_NOR.png
sankey_selfefficacy_remediation_intention_NOR.png

Perceived behavioural control: financial and other burden and ease

sankey_pb_control_intention_NOR.png
sankey_perceivedburden_intention_NOR.png
sankey_perceived_ease_intention_NOR.png

Perceived cost

sankey_perceivedcost_intention_NOR.png
sankey_ra23_intention_NOR.png
sankey_ra26_intention_NOR.png

Aesthetic impact of remediation works on a dwelling

sankey_aesthet.impact_intention_NOR.png

Economic impact of radon on a property value

sankey_economicimpact_intention_NOR.png

Subjective norms

sankey_subjectivenorms_intention_NOR.png

Descriptive norms

sankey_descriptivenorms_intention_NOR.png

Health effect perception

sankey_ra37_1_intention_NOR.png

Information processing

sankey_heuristic_intention_NOR.png
sankey_heuristic_processing_intention_NOR.png
sankey_systematic_intention_NOR.png

Information comprehensiveness

sankey_info_comprehensiveness_intention_NOR.png

Information uncertainty

sankey_ra50_intention_NOR.png

Affective response to information

sankey_affective_response_intention_NOR.png

Relationship Between Radon Awareness and Behavioural Intention to Act on Radon Risk

sankey_sali1_NOR.png
bottom of page