top of page
radonorm_logo_vaaka_slogan_CMYK-removebg
Slovenia.png

Findings for

Slovenia

Cite as:

Reference: Perko, T., et al., Measuring societal attitudes and behaviours towards radon indoors: A case study of Slovenia. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 2024. 272: p. 107355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2023.107355

Methodology

The study employed Computer-Assisted Web Interviewing (CAWI) to survey a sample of the Slovenian population. The panel consisted of 25,000 potential respondents from the panel of the marketing company MEDIANA, from which participants for this study were randomly selected. The final sample included 2,012 respondents, representative of the Slovenian population aged 18 and over, with respect to gender, age, and region, and stratified according to the total number of inhabitants in Slovenia. The response rate was 27.6%.

Among the respondents, 77.5% lived in low radon risk areas, 14.2% in medium risk areas, and 8.4% in high risk areas. The average duration of the interviews was 19 minutes, conducted between November 29 and December 8, 2022.

The questionnaire included a short video offering basic and neutral information about radon and the mitigation of elevated radon levels in homes. This video was shown selectively, with the aim of delivering relevant information to those who needed it most, enabling them to respond heuristically to questions regarding attitudes, emotions, and opinions.

To ensure high data quality, a pilot study with 300 participants was conducted in the Walloon region of Belgium prior to the main fieldwork. This was followed by a soft launch in Slovenian, involving a sample of 264 participants.

Ethical approval for the study was granted by the University of Antwerp, Belgium, with additional oversight provided by the RadoNorm ethical committee. The questionnaire development, translation into Slovenian, and fieldwork were funded by the Slovenian Radiation Protection Administration (Služba za varstvo pred sevanji – SRPA), Slovenia. Data were analysed by SCK CEN, Belgium and University Antwerp, Belgium and are available at DOI:10.20348/STOREDB/1179/1308

Download the questionnaire PDF here.

Download a full report PDF here.

Results

Radon protection behaviour

Do people in Slovenia test and mitigate?

ra2.1.png
ra2.2.png
ra2.4.png
ra2.5.png

Intention to protect from radon

What is the public willingness to adopt radon protection measures in Slovenia?

ra5.png

Radon awareness

Are people in Slovenia aware of radon?

ra1_overview.png
ra1_area.png

Salience

Is radon indoor seen as an important topic in Slovenia?

salience.png
salience_area.png

Radon Knowledge

How much people in Slovenia know about radon?

awareness.png
awareness_noprone.png

Risk perception

How do people in Slovenia perceive radiological, radon and other risks?

risk_perception.png

Confidence in authorities for risk management

To what extent do Slovenes have confidence in their authorities' ability to manage risks?

confidence.png

Knowing radon stakeholders

Which stakeholders related to radon are known to Slovenes?

knowing_stakeholders.png
knowing_stakeholders_area.png

Who in Slovenia is recognized as a trustworthy source of information about radon risks?

Truthfulness of radon stakeholders

truth.png
truth_area.png
com_truth_fam.png

Which stakeholders involved in radon mitigation in Ireland are recognized as technically competent?

Competence of radon stakeholders

competence.png
competence_area.png
com_truth_fam.png

Severity

What are people's beliefs regarding the seriousness of negative consequences due to radon?

severity.png
severity_video.png
severity_area.png

Susceptibility

Do people in Slovenia believe that radon increases the likelihood of health consequences?

susceptibility.png
susceptibility_video.png
susceptibility_area.png

Response efficacy: remediation

Do individuals believe dwelling remediation is effective in reducing radon concentration?

remediation.png
remediation_video.png
remediation_area.png

Self-efficacy

Do residents in Slovenia have confidence in their own ability to conduct radon testing and mitigation effectively?

self_efficacy.png
self_efficacy_video.png
self_efficacy_area.png

Perceived behavioural control: financial and other burden and ease

Is radon testing and mitigation perceived as a financial or other burden?

perceived_behaviour.png
perceived_behaviour_area.png

Aesthetic impact of remediation works on a dwelling

Do residents believe that radon mitigation perceived as a financial or other burden?

aesthetic_impact.png

Economic impact of radon on a property value

Does a radon problem in a building negatively impact its financial value?

economic_impact.png

Is radon testing and mitigation a common practice within social groups?

Descriptive norms

perceived_behaviour.png
perceived_behaviour_area.png

Subjective norms

Do family members and friends of resopondents care about radon-related issues?

subjective_norms.png
subjective_norms_area.png

Health effect perception

Do individuals have acquaintances who may have experienced health issues as a result of radon exposure?

health_effect.png

Stigma

Is there a risk of stigma associated with radon in dwellings?

stigma.png

Information processing

How do people process information about radon?

info_proc.png

Information comprehensiveness

Is there enough information readily accessible?

info_comp.png

Information uncertainty

Is there too much uncertainty to make informed decisions?

info_uncer.png

Affective response to information

Does information related to radon elicit negative emotions?

response_info.png

Preference for post-survey radon related information

Which communication channels are recommended for radon-related communication?

post_survey.png

Trustworthiness of radon stakeholders

Who in Slovenia is recognized as a trustworthy source of information about radon risks?

com_truth_fam.png

Factors Influencing Behavioural Intention

Radon awareness

Sankey_awareness.png

Salience

Sankey_salience.png

Radon knowledge

Sankey_knowledge.png

Risk perception

Sankey_rp.png

Severity

Sankey_severity.png

Susceptibility

Sankey_susceptibility.png

Response efficacy: remediation

Sankey_response_eff.png

Perceived behavioural control: financial and other burden and ease

Sanke_ease.png
Sankey_burden.png
Sankey_control.png

Aesthetic impact of remediation works on a dwelling

Sankey_aesthetic.png

Economic impact of radon on a property value

Sankey_economic.png

Health effect perception

Sankey_health.png

Descriptive norms

Sankey_health.png

Stigma

Sankey_stigma.png

Information processing

Sankey_heur_info.png
Sankey_syst_info.png

Affective response to information

Sankey_aff_response.png

Relationship Between Radon Awareness and Behavioural Intention to Act on Radon Risk

Sankey_RA5_1.png
Sankey_RA5_2.png
bottom of page